Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-18 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mär 17 2025, Robert Dubner wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 04:13 >> To: James K. Lowden >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery &

RE: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-17 Thread Robert Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Schwab > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 04:13 > To: James K. Lowden > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery > > On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > >

RE: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-17 Thread Robert Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Schwab > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 04:13 > To: James K. Lowden > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery > > On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:18:22 +0100 > > Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > >> libgcobol/configure.tgt says it's supported on powerpc64le. > > > > Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-17 Thread Sam James
Andreas Schwab writes: > On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:18:22 +0100 >> Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >>> libgcobol/configure.tgt says it's supported on powerpc64le. >> >> Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is enabled if >> >> 1. --enable-languag

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-17 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:18:22 +0100 > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> libgcobol/configure.tgt says it's supported on powerpc64le. > > Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is enabled if > > 1. --enable-languages=all, and > 2. the host and targe

RE: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-15 Thread Robert Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Orth > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 15:07 > To: James K. Lowden > Cc: Andreas Schwab ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery > > Hi James, > > > Our i

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-15 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:06:58 +0100 Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi James, > > > Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is enabled if > > > > 1. --enable-languages=all, and > > 2. the host and target are "known good", x86_64 or aarch64 > > you tend to forget there's a world outside of L

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-13 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:45:23 -0400 Paul Koning wrote: > > 3. --enable-languages=cobol, and > > 4. the host and target are "plausible", 64-bit LE. > > Why does it need LE? I understand 64 bits. I might try it on my > PowerPC based Mac. :-) That's a good point. "Need" I don't know. I'm not

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:33:08PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote: > I guess the most controversial engineering choice was to rely on > __int128 and _Float128. Those gave us native processing and binary <-> > string conversion. Having been advised of real.cc, we're taking a > look. If we can get 1

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-13 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:18:22 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: > > + > > +# It's early days for COBOL, and it is known to compile on only > > some host and +# target systems. We remove COBOL from other builds > > with a warning. + > > +cobol_is_okay_host="no" > > +cobol_is_okay_target="no" > > + > >

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi James, > Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is enabled if > > 1. --enable-languages=all, and > 2. the host and target are "known good", x86_64 or aarch64 you tend to forget there's a world outside of Linux, actually: as you can see at least in PRs cobol/119217 and cobol/11

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-13 Thread Paul Koning
> On Mar 13, 2025, at 2:33 PM, James K. Lowden wrote: > > ... > 3. --enable-languages=cobol, and > 4. the host and target are "plausible", 64-bit LE. Why does it need LE? I understand 64 bits. I might try it on my PowerPC based Mac. :-) paul

Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery

2025-03-11 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Feb 18 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: > @@ -2525,6 +2543,36 @@ directories, to avoid imposing the performance cost of >missing_languages=`echo "$missing_languages" | sed -e "s/^,//" -e "s/,$//"` >stage1_languages=`echo "$stage1_languages" | sed -e "s/^,//" -e "s/,$//"` >new_enable_lan