On Mär 17 2025, Robert Dubner wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> >> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 04:13 >> To: James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery >> >> On Mär 13 2025, James K. Lowden wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:18:22 +0100 >> > Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote: >> > >> >> libgcobol/configure.tgt says it's supported on powerpc64le. >> > >> > Our intention, tell me if you disagree, is that cobol is enabled if >> > >> > 1. --enable-languages=all, and >> > 2. the host and target are "known good", x86_64 or aarch64 >> >> But powerpc64le is known good as well. > > Does that mean that in addition to compiling the compiler you've been able > to compile and run COBOL with it? (I don't have a powerpc available on > which to check.)
libgcobol/configure.tgt says it's supported. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
