Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:15:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
>
>
> Thanks for the commit. However, c
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you also fix the ChangeLog?
You used gcc/ChangeLog but the proper
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> I thought about that, too. But it is likely that the pattern for array of
> target class
> "__class_%s_%d_%d" will eventually clash with the non-array target class
> "__class_%s"
which proves that I am too sleep depriev
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:50:24, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
>>
>> Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
>> target
>> classes end with "_t", and target
