Hi Bernd, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > I thought about that, too. But it is likely that the pattern for array of > target class > "__class_%s_%d_%d" will eventually clash with the non-array target class > "__class_%s"
which proves that I am too sleep deprieved to properly read the patch ... > Would you prefer to change the letters to a->A p->P, and add an uppercase T > to the > target array pattern, while keeping the name of the normal target class as it > is? No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html Tobias
