};
>
> +/* Costs to use when optimizing for MIPS P8700 */ static const struct
> +riscv_tune_param mips_p8700_tune_info = {
> + {COSTS_N_INSNS (4), COSTS_N_INSNS (4)},/* fp_add */
> + {COSTS_N_INSNS (5), COSTS_N_INSNS (5)},/* fp_mul */
> + {COSTS_N_INSNS (17), COSTS_N
/
+ true, /* use_divmod_expansion */
+ false, /* overlap_op_by_pieces */
+ RISCV_FUSE_NOTHING, /* fusible_ops */
+ NULL, /* vector cost */
+ NULL, /* function_align */
+ NULL, /* jump_align */
+ NULL, /* loop_align */
Thank you @Jeff Law for the suggestions and
>> Just quickly scanning the insn reservations, I suspect you're missing many
>> cases and the compiler will trip assertion failures if you are missing cases.
Sure will look at it .
>> You might want to look at these values more closely. If you have
Thank you @Kito Cheng for early suggestions ,we will break down the patch like
suggested and address the below comments .
~U
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: 11 April 2025 12:37
To: Umesh Kalappa
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; kito.ch...@sifive.com; Jesse Huang
; pal...@dabbel
