msp430-elf has had regressions for a while. There was other instability at the
time the regression started, so I waited to see if it'd correct itself, but it
didn't and I finally took a looksie.
We're processing this in lower-subreg:
(insn 30 64 42 6 (set (subreg:SI (reg/v:HI 33 [ oz ]) 0)
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 23:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:24:02PM -0700, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > The patch fixes this by simply putting gsi_next in else, which avoids
> > the above issue.
> > Bootstrap+test in progress on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> > OK to commit if
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:24:02PM -0700, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> The patch fixes this by simply putting gsi_next in else, which avoids
> the above issue.
> Bootstrap+test in progress on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> OK to commit if passes ?
No ChangeLog entry.
--- a/gcc/tree-if-conv.c
+++ b/g
u.
OK to commit if passes ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92085-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92085-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..c18f820a09e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92085-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
