On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" writes:
> > This is the updated patch with md.texi change. The testcase is the same.
> > Tested on x32. OK to install?
>
> Since I commented on the original, this looks good to me, but I can't
> approve it.
Approved then.
Thanks,
Rich
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> This is the updated patch with md.texi change. The testcase is the same.
> Tested on x32. OK to install?
Since I commented on the original, this looks good to me, but I can't
approve it.
Thanks,
Richard
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Y
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>>> emit_block_move_via_movmem and set_storage_via_setmem have
>>>
>>> for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT); mode != VOIDmode;
>>>mode = GET_M
Y
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>> emit_block_move_via_movmem and set_storage_via_setmem have
>>
>> for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT); mode != VOIDmode;
>>mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode))
>> {
>> enum insn_code cod
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> emit_block_move_via_movmem and set_storage_via_setmem have
>
> for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT); mode != VOIDmode;
>mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode))
> {
> enum insn_code code = direct_optab_handler (movmem_optab, mode);
>
> if (code !=
emit_block_move_via_movmem and set_storage_via_setmem have
for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT); mode != VOIDmode;
mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode))
{
enum insn_code code = direct_optab_handler (movmem_optab, mode);
if (code != CODE_FOR_nothing
/* We
