On 19 November 2017 at 11:01, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 08:53 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than
>> 0...1. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of
>> possible overflow when the profile ends up cummula
On 11/17/2017 08:53 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than
0...1. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of
possible overflow when the profile ends up cummulating too high after
inlining.
MThere are two testcases that needs
Hi,
this patch makes static profile to be in range 0...2^30 rather than
0...1. This is safe now as profile-counts are taking care of
possible overflow when the profile ends up cummulating too high after
inlining.
MThere are two testcases that needs adusting. dump-2.c simply checks
for specific