On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:49:24PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> The test g++.dg/abi/anon2.C introduced at r208157 causes:
>
> UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler
> .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N11D1C3fn1ENS0_1BE
> UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-asse
The test g++.dg/abi/anon2.C introduced at r208157 causes:
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\\t]_?_ZN2N11D1C3fn1ENS0_1BE
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\\t]_?_ZN2N11D1C3fn2ES1_
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/ano
My earlier patch didn't go far enough; when we apply a name for linkage
purposes and fix up the visibility of the type, we also need to fix up
the visibility and names of any members and implementation bits.
At first I thought we would need to deal with static data members as
well as functions
