On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:49:24PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > The test g++.dg/abi/anon2.C introduced at r208157 causes: > > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N11D1C3fn1ENS0_1BE > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N11D1C3fn2ES1_ > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N23._31C3fn1ENS0_1BE > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N23._31C3fn2ES1_ > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N31D1CIiE3fn1ENS0_1BE > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N31D1CIiE3fn2ES2_ > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N43._91CIiE3fn1ENS0_1BE > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/abi/anon2.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not > .weak(_definition)?[ \\t]_?_ZN2N43._91CIiE3fn2ES2_ > > This is silenced by the following patch
Rainer has already posted similar patch earlier today. Jakub