On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> Ping...
>
> this is still open,
> in short, the configuration
>
> ../gcc-4.9-20140202/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/arm-linux-gnueabihf-cross
> --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,ada
Ping...
this is still open,
in short, the configuration
../gcc-4.9-20140202/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/arm-linux-gnueabihf-cross
--host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,ada --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --wi
Ping...
>
> Hello,
>
> and Ping for this patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01552.html
>
>
> note however, that cross-building is probably broken
> anyway in the moment by r205690,
>
>
> Thanks
> Bernd.
>
>> there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always
>
Hello,
and Ping for this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01552.html
note however, that cross-building is probably broken
anyway in the moment by r205690,
Thanks
Bernd.
> there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always
> defined, especially not in gcc/gli
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:57:10, Mike Strump wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ok for trunk?
>
> ENOPATCH?
Ooops -- thanks for catching this.
Again, this time with patch:
there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always
defined, especially not i
On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ok for trunk?
ENOPATCH?
Hi,
there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always
defined, especially not in gcc/glimits.h, which seems to be the fall-back
if the target fails to have a working limits.h.
When I create a cross-compiler for --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf, the
working limits.h is overwritten by f
