Ping...
> > Hello, > > and Ping for this patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01552.html > > > note however, that cross-building is probably broken > anyway in the moment by r205690, > > > Thanks > Bernd. > >> there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always >> defined, especially not in gcc/glimits.h, which seems to be the fall-back >> if the target fails to have a working limits.h. >> >> When I create a cross-compiler for --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf, the >> working limits.h is overwritten by fix-includes with a copy of gcc/glimits.h. >> Probably because it is not possible to compile the target headers with the >> build >> compiler and produce meaningful test results. >> >> However because gcc/glimits.h does not define SSIZE_MAX the following build >> fails with >> >> In file included from ../../gcc-4.9-20131215/gcc/config/host-linux.c:21:0: >> ../../gcc-4.9-20131215/gcc/config/host-linux.c: In function 'int >> linux_gt_pch_use_address(void*, size_t, int, size_t)': >> ../../gcc-4.9-20131215/gcc/config/host-linux.c:215:43: error: 'SSIZE_MAX' >> was not declared in this scope >> nbytes = read (fd, base, MIN (size, SSIZE_MAX)); >> ^ >> ../../gcc-4.9-20131215/gcc/system.h:351:26: note: in definition of macro >> 'MIN' >> #define MIN(X,Y) ((X) < (Y) ? (X) : (Y)) >> ^ >> >> >> The most simple way to fix this would be to not use SSIZE_MAX >> here. >> >> Boot-Strapped and regression-tested on X86_64. >> Plus cross-build for arm-linux-gnueabihf. >> >> Ok for trunk? >> >> >> Thanks >> Bernd.
