> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Stubbs [mailto:a...@codesourcery.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2012 17:12
> An: EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31)
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; libstd...@gcc.gnu.org;
> p...@codesourcery.com; pwaecht...@mac.com; d...@false.org
>
On 19.03.2012 18:32, Paul Brook wrote:
while I have your attention: what is an virtual unwind frame? ;)
No such thing exists.
Throwing an exception is a muti-stage process. It requires unwinding the
stack frame twice, taking different actions in the process. "Forced"
unwinding and backtracing
> while I have your attention: what is an virtual unwind frame? ;)
No such thing exists.
Throwing an exception is a muti-stage process. It requires unwinding the
stack frame twice, taking different actions in the process. "Forced"
unwinding and backtracing add extra complications. The _US_*
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Stubbs
> wrote:
> > On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP,
> CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
> >>
> >> The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
> >> please consider for adding it.
> >
> >
> > Here's the full original patch with
