On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> And one question: "declaration linking" is used in the description
>> of Link-time optimization improvements, alas that string does not
>> appear anywhere in either the source tree or documentation?
> It is my own name indeed. lto-symtab.c does merge decl
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > this is updated patch. I tried to explain better the situation WRT
> > incremental linking.
>
> Thank you, Jan. I had a couple of editorial changes on top of
> this, which I finally managed to commit. (See the patch below.)
>
> And one question: "d
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this is updated patch. I tried to explain better the situation WRT
> incremental linking.
Thank you, Jan. I had a couple of editorial changes on top of
this, which I finally managed to commit. (See the patch below.)
And one question: "declaration linki
On 19/01/16 16:45 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -r1.46 changes.html
--- changes.html22 Dec 2015 19:23:31 - 1
> >+ is not performed. GCC 7 will support incremental IL linking.
>
> "IL" again what does this mean to users?
Thanks for corrections, I will apply them and post updated patch. Here I
wanted to explain that gcc -r should now give a correct code (while with
earlier GCC releases it will
On 01/19/2016 08:45 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch mentiones few user visible changes I can think of. I will
add some quality data on firefox once stage3 closes.
It seems that the optimization section of changes.html deserve some work :)
Honza
Index: changes.html
==
Hi,
this patch mentiones few user visible changes I can think of. I will
add some quality data on firefox once stage3 closes.
It seems that the optimization section of changes.html deserve some work :)
Honza
Index: changes.html
===
I've committed the following update to reflect the recent addition.
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 changes.html
--- changes.html14 May 2015
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Is the following any better? Thanks,
Yes, this looks fine.
(I admit that "flexible array member-like arrays" confused me a bit,
but that's probably me not fully getting standards language. ;-)
Gerald
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:04:48PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, 11 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Ok to commit?
>
> as maintainer I am happy for you to commit documentation/web changes
> without approval, though I am also happy to review.
I was hoping you could glance
Hi Marek,
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Ok to commit?
as maintainer I am happy for you to commit documentation/web changes
without approval, though I am also happy to review.
> +General Optimizer Improvements
> +
> +UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer gained a new sanitization option:
Ok to commit?
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 changes.html
--- changes.html6 May 2015 09:55:29 - 1.3
+++ changes.html11 May
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> The only drawback of this, and some similar cases, is that we now
>> risk referring to older versions on a release branch.
> Yes, I realised that problem when making the change and linking to the
> versions that were current at the time. One option woul
On 09 Apr 12:32, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > This adds Pointer Bounds Checker and MPX support to GCC 5 changes.
> > Is it OK?
>
> Nice, thank you!
>
> Can you just replace "runtime checks" by "run-time checks" and
> "IA-32/x86-64 GNU/Linux target" by "x86
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> This adds Pointer Bounds Checker and MPX support to GCC 5 changes.
> Is it OK?
Nice, thank you!
Can you just replace "runtime checks" by "run-time checks" and
"IA-32/x86-64 GNU/Linux target" by "x86/x86-64 GNU/Linux targets"
(x86, as we had agreed upon
Hi,
This adds Pointer Bounds Checker and MPX support to GCC 5 changes. Is it OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
--- changes.html2015-04-09 12:18:47.67230 +0300
+++ changes.html2015-04-09 12:58:23.677983000 +0300
@@ -158,20 +158,29 @@
-fsanitize=alignment: enable alignment checking, d
On 08/04/15 13:06 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'm also noting one old change in the GCC 4.5 page, and
removing/changing some links to the C++0x status table. The list of
features supported on trunk is fairly irrelevant to someone looking at
the 4.4 rel
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm also noting one old change in the GCC 4.5 page, and
> removing/changing some links to the C++0x status table. The list of
> features supported on trunk is fairly irrelevant to someone looking at
> the 4.4 release notes, so I've linked to the docs for
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This adds recent libstdc++ updates to gcc-5/changes.html
Nice! Just a most minor change to end a list with a full stop
instead of a semi-colon. Applied.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
==
This adds recent libstdc++ updates to gcc-5/changes.html
I'm also noting one old change in the GCC 4.5 page, and
removing/changing some links to the C++0x status table. The list of
features supported on trunk is fairly irrelevant to someone looking at
the 4.4 release notes, so I've linked to the
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 16:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This patch adds the Cortex-A53 erratum workaround options item to the
changes page (and adds the AArch64 section of that page in the
process) Ok?
Looks perfect to me.
Thanks,
Gerald
On 11/12/14 09:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds the Cortex-A53 erratum workaround options item to the
changes page
(and adds the AArch64 section of that page in the process)
Ok?
OK
jeff
Hi all,
This patch adds the Cortex-A53 erratum workaround options item to the
changes page
(and adds the AArch64 section of that page in the process)
Ok?
Thanks,
KyrillIndex: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdoc
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> And porting_to.html.
I plan to prepare "porting to" this week.
Marek
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:50:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > A trivial patch to document that the C default has been changed.
>
> This should be also mentioned at the toplevel "Caveats" section.
Ok, I'll commit the following as well
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:50:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > A trivial patch to document that the C default has been changed.
>
> This should be also mentioned at the toplevel "Caveats" section.
And porting_to.html.
Jakub
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> A trivial patch to document that the C default has been changed.
This should be also mentioned at the toplevel "Caveats" section.
Richard.
> Applying.
>
> Index: changes.html
> =
A trivial patch to document that the C default has been changed.
Applying.
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 changes.html
--- changes.html10
28 matches
Mail list logo
