On Mon, 11 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote: > Is the following any better? Thanks,
Yes, this looks fine. (I admit that "flexible array member-like arrays" confused me a bit, but that's probably me not fully getting standards language. ;-) Gerald
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote: > Is the following any better? Thanks,
Yes, this looks fine. (I admit that "flexible array member-like arrays" confused me a bit, but that's probably me not fully getting standards language. ;-) Gerald