On Apr 28, 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Okay for trunk with such tweaks. Thank you! Also okay for the 9 branch,
> after waiting to see if any fallout appears.
Thanks, I've just pushed it to the gcc-9 branch.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhe/himhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
F
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:15:58PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > s/mmfl/mffs/
> > s/mmfs/mffs/
> > s/mmsl/mffsl/
>
> Oh, my, looks like I missed some mispellings of ffmls :-P
It helps to read the mnemonics as the full name -- the Power mnemonic
ay for the 9 branch,
> after waiting to see if any fallout appears.
Thanks, here's what I'm checking in...
[rs6000] fix mffsl emulation
From: Alexandre Oliva
The emulation of mffsl with mffs, used when !TARGET_P9_MISC, is going
through the motions, but not storing the result in
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:25:04AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> >> > since all the top bits are zeros always, it will always be a subnormal
> >> > number, so all comparisons will work as expected / wanted.
> >>
> >> *nod*, as long as there's
d test_mffsl.c with and without -mpower9-misc.
Regstrapping on ppc64le-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
[rs6000] fix mffsl emulation
From: Alexandre Oliva
The emulation of mffsl with mffs, used when !TARGET_P9_MISC, is going
through the motions, but not storing the result in the given
operands[0]; it
Hi!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:52:46AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:08:55AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> I wasn't sure simplify_gen_subreg might possibly emit any code in
> >> obscure cases,
>
> > It never does, i
Hello, Segher,
On Apr 23, 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:08:55AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I wasn't sure simplify_gen_subreg might possibly emit any code in
>> obscure cases,
> It never does, it just returns an RTX. Where would it emit the insns to?
I'm p
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:08:55AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> The emulation of mffsl with mffs, used when !TARGET_P9_MISC, is going
> through the motions, but not storing the result in the given
> operands[0]; it rather modifies operands[0] without effect.
Heh, oops.
> It also
> creates
The emulation of mffsl with mffs, used when !TARGET_P9_MISC, is going
through the motions, but not storing the result in the given
operands[0]; it rather modifies operands[0] without effect. It also
creates a DImode pseudo that it doesn't use, a DFmode pseudo that's
unnecessary AFAICT, and it's
