On 25 April 2022 14:12:30 CEST, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
>> I have just pushed the attached fix for two UNRESOLVED checks at -O0 that I
>> hadn’t seen.
>
>I don't like forcing of DSE in -O0 compilation, wouldn't it be better
>
Le 25/04/2022 à 14:12, Jakub Jelinek a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
I have just pushed the attached fix for two UNRESOLVED checks at -O0 that I
hadn’t seen.
I don't like forcing of DSE in -O0 compilation, wouldn't it be better
to just not check the dse
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> I have just pushed the attached fix for two UNRESOLVED checks at -O0 that I
> hadn’t seen.
I don't like forcing of DSE in -O0 compilation, wouldn't it be better
to just not check the dse dump at -O0 like in the following patch?
Even
I have just pushed the attached fix for two UNRESOLVED checks at
-O0 that I hadn’t seen.From 6cc26f3037a18b9a958b4ac2a1363149a7fccd39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikael Morin
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:14:20 +0200
Subject: [pushed] =?UTF-8?q?testsuite:=C2=A0add=20additional=20option=20to?=
=?U
