I am on travel and only doing email from my phone. Ralf and I had dinner
together last night and he mentioned not understanding some parts of the patch.
I won't be home until next week to actually test this.
I guess hoping due diligence was used and knowing I may whine next week if it
breaks
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 05/30/2011 04:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* Non-Solaris SPARC changes:
>>
>> After I had moved sparc/sol2-c[in].asm to libgcc, I noticed that
>> despite the name a few non-Solaris targets uses those files, too:
>>
>> sparc-*-elf*,
On 05/30/2011 04:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* Non-Solaris SPARC changes:
>>
>> After I had moved sparc/sol2-c[in].asm to libgcc, I noticed that
>> despite the name a few non-Solaris targets uses those files, too:
>>
>> sparc-*-elf*, sparc-*-rtems*, sparc64-*-elf*, sparc64-*-rtems*
>
>
Eric Botcazou writes:
>> * Non-Solaris SPARC changes:
>>
>> After I had moved sparc/sol2-c[in].asm to libgcc, I noticed that
>> despite the name a few non-Solaris targets uses those files, too:
>>
>> sparc-*-elf*, sparc-*-rtems*, sparc64-*-elf*, sparc64-*-rtems*
>
> Yes, I tried to untangle
> * Non-Solaris SPARC changes:
>
> After I had moved sparc/sol2-c[in].asm to libgcc, I noticed that
> despite the name a few non-Solaris targets uses those files, too:
>
> sparc-*-elf*, sparc-*-rtems*, sparc64-*-elf*, sparc64-*-rtems*
Yes, I tried to untangle that, but the RTEMS folks compla
This is a revised version of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00098.html
to move the Solaris startup files to toplevel libgcc. While I can
commit most if it myself, I need approval/testing in a few areas:
* Non-Solaris build changes:
** libgcc/Makefile.in now has cpu_type,
