On 11/9/22 02:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 01:40:03PM -1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
A comment in D2552R1:
"The only questionable (but still conforming) case we found was
[[carries_dependency(some_argument)]] on GCC, where the emitted diagnostic said
that the
carries_dependency
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 01:40:03PM -1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > A comment in D2552R1:
> > "The only questionable (but still conforming) case we found was
> > [[carries_dependency(some_argument)]] on GCC, where the emitted diagnostic
> > said that the
> > carries_dependency attribute is not supp
On 11/8/22 04:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
A comment in D2552R1:
"The only questionable (but still conforming) case we found was
[[carries_dependency(some_argument)]] on GCC, where the emitted diagnostic said
that the
carries_dependency attribute is not supported, but did not specifically call
Hi!
A comment in D2552R1:
"The only questionable (but still conforming) case we found was
[[carries_dependency(some_argument)]] on GCC, where the emitted diagnostic said
that the
carries_dependency attribute is not supported, but did not specifically call
out the syntax error
in the argument cla
