Hi!
A comment in D2552R1:
"The only questionable (but still conforming) case we found was
[[carries_dependency(some_argument)]] on GCC, where the emitted diagnostic said
that the
carries_dependency attribute is not supported, but did not specifically call
out the syntax error
in the argument clause."
made me try the following patch, where we'll error at least
for arguments to the attribute and for some uses of the attribute
appertaining to something not mentioned in the standard warn
with different diagnostics (or should that be an error?; clang++
does that, but I think we never do for any attribute, standard or not).
The diagnostics on toplevel attribute declaration is still an
attribute ignored warning and on empty statement different wording.
The paper additionally mentions
struct X { [[nodiscard]]; }; // no diagnostic on GCC
and 2 cases of missing diagnostics on [[fallthrough]] (guess I should
file a PR about those; one problem is that do { ... } while (0); there
is replaced during genericization just by ... and another that
[[fallthrough]] there is followed by a label, but not user/case/default
label, but an artificial one created from while loop genericization.
Thoughts on this?
2022-11-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* tree.cc (handle_carries_dependency_attribute): New function.
(std_attribute_table): Add carries_dependency attribute.
* parser.cc (cp_parser_check_std_attribute): Add carries_dependency
attribute.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/attr-carries_dependency1.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/tree.cc.jj 2022-11-07 10:30:42.758629740 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/tree.cc 2022-11-08 14:45:08.853864684 +0100
@@ -4923,6 +4923,32 @@ structural_type_p (tree t, bool explain)
return true;
}
+/* Partially handle the C++11 [[carries_dependency]] attribute.
+ Just emit a different diagnostics when it is used on something the
+ spec doesn't allow vs. where it allows and we just choose to ignore
+ it. */
+
+static tree
+handle_carries_dependency_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
+ tree ARG_UNUSED (args),
+ int ARG_UNUSED (flags),
+ bool *no_add_attrs)
+{
+ if (TREE_CODE (*node) != FUNCTION_DECL
+ && TREE_CODE (*node) != PARM_DECL)
+ {
+ warning (OPT_Wattributes, "%qE attribute can only be applied to "
+ "functions or parameters", name);
+ *no_add_attrs = true;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ warning (OPT_Wattributes, "%qE attribute ignored", name);
+ *no_add_attrs = true;
+ }
+ return NULL_TREE;
+}
+
/* Handle the C++17 [[nodiscard]] attribute, which is similar to the GNU
warn_unused_result attribute. */
@@ -5036,6 +5062,8 @@ const struct attribute_spec std_attribut
handle_likeliness_attribute, attr_cold_hot_exclusions },
{ "noreturn", 0, 0, true, false, false, false,
handle_noreturn_attribute, attr_noreturn_exclusions },
+ { "carries_dependency", 0, 0, true, false, false, false,
+ handle_carries_dependency_attribute, NULL },
{ NULL, 0, 0, false, false, false, false, NULL, NULL }
};
--- gcc/cp/parser.cc.jj 2022-11-04 18:11:41.523945997 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/parser.cc 2022-11-08 13:41:35.075135139 +0100
@@ -29239,8 +29239,7 @@ cp_parser_std_attribute (cp_parser *pars
/* Warn if the attribute ATTRIBUTE appears more than once in the
attribute-list ATTRIBUTES. This used to be enforced for certain
- attributes, but the restriction was removed in P2156. Note that
- carries_dependency ([dcl.attr.depend]) isn't implemented yet in GCC.
+ attributes, but the restriction was removed in P2156.
LOC is the location of ATTRIBUTE. Returns true if ATTRIBUTE was not
found in ATTRIBUTES. */
@@ -29249,7 +29248,7 @@ cp_parser_check_std_attribute (location_
{
static auto alist = { "noreturn", "deprecated", "nodiscard", "maybe_unused",
"likely", "unlikely", "fallthrough",
- "no_unique_address" };
+ "no_unique_address", "carries_dependency" };
if (attributes)
for (const auto &a : alist)
if (is_attribute_p (a, get_attribute_name (attribute))
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/attr-carries_dependency1.C.jj 2022-11-08
15:17:43.168238390 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/attr-carries_dependency1.C 2022-11-08
15:16:39.695104787 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+[[carries_dependency]] int *f1 (); // { dg-warning "attribute
ignored" }
+int f2 (int *x [[carries_dependency]]); // { dg-warning
"attribute ignored" }
+[[carries_dependency]] int f3 (); // { dg-warning "attribute
ignored" }
+int f4 (int x [[carries_dependency]]); // { dg-warning "attribute
ignored" }
+[[carries_dependency(1)]] int f5 (); // { dg-error
"'carries_dependency' attribute does not take any arguments" }
+[[carries_dependency]] int v; // { dg-warning
"'carries_dependency' attribute can only be applied to functions or parameters"
}
+[[carries_dependency]]; // { dg-warning
"attribute ignored" }
+void
+f6 ()
+{
+ [[carries_dependency]]; // { dg-warning "attributes at
the beginning of statement are ignored" }
+}
+#if __has_cpp_attribute(carries_dependency)
+#error carries_dependency attribute is not actually implemented
+#endif
Jakub
