On 6/27/19 9:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:24:58AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 6/27/19 12:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
>>>
>>> I
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:24:58AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 6/27/19 12:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
> >
> > I think it caused
> > +FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa
On 6/27/19 12:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
>
> I think it caused
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"
> which admittedly a
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:05 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
> >
> > I think it caused
> > +FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:05 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
>
> I think it caused
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"
> whic
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Yes, the patch works OK. I'll regression test it and push it later today.
I think it caused
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;"
which admittedly already is xfailed on various targets.
We now newly ve
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > The patch isn't correct if TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE, but not TARGET_AVX, because
> > in that case it will push only that 8 and nothing else, while you really
> > want to have 16 and 8 in that order, so that it tries to vectorize first
> >
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:17:26AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Please note that the patch regresses
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vect-simd-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> > "vectorized [1-3] loops" 2
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:17:26AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please note that the patch regresses
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vect-simd-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "vectorized [1-3] loops" 2
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vect-simd-15.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "vectorized [1-3] loops"
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On June 26, 2019 10:25:44 AM GMT+02:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >>
> >> Now that TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE is implemented, the compiler should be
> >> able to auto-vectorize:
> >
> >On a rela
On June 26, 2019 10:25:44 AM GMT+02:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Now that TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE is implemented, the compiler should be
>> able to auto-vectorize:
>
>On a related note, following slightly changed testcase:
>
>void
>foo (char *restr
On June 26, 2019 10:17:26 AM GMT+02:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>Now that TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE is implemented, the compiler should be
>able to auto-vectorize:
>
>void
>foo (char *restrict r, char *restrict a)
>{
> for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
>r[i] += a[i];
>}
>
>Attached patch enables the conversio
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> Now that TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE is implemented, the compiler should be
> able to auto-vectorize:
On a related note, following slightly changed testcase:
void
foo (char *restrict r, char *restrict a)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 24; i++)
r[i] +=
Now that TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE is implemented, the compiler should be
able to auto-vectorize:
void
foo (char *restrict r, char *restrict a)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
r[i] += a[i];
}
Attached patch enables the conversion and produces:
foo:
movq(%rdi), %xmm1
movq(%r
14 matches
Mail list logo
