Thank you all very much for your help! )
Mariam
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, 04:04 Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/24 3:43 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> >> Thanks. I was just about to reach out to confirm we're OK on aarch64.
> >> I was going to run everything through one of the cfarm machines or
>
On 12/9/24 3:43 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks. I was just about to reach out to confirm we're OK on aarch64.
I was going to run everything through one of the cfarm machines or
perhaps my rpi as a final test.
Ah, yeah. I'm hopelessly behind on gcc-patches, so hadn't seen that
you wer
Jeff Law writes:
> On 12/9/24 10:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Mariam Arutunian writes:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch series is a revised version of the following:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668229.html.
>>>
>>> In this version:
>>>
>>> - Patch 09/12 has
On 12/9/24 10:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Mariam Arutunian writes:
Hello,
This patch series is a revised version of the following:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668229.html.
In this version:
- Patch 09/12 has been updated with comments provided by Matevos
Mariam Arutunian writes:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series is a revised version of the following:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668229.html.
>
> In this version:
>
>- Patch 09/12 has been updated with comments provided by Matevos, which
>were missing in the previou
Hello,
This patch series is a revised version of the following:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668229.html.
In this version:
- Patch 09/12 has been updated with comments provided by Matevos, which
were missing in the previously submitted series.
- Patch 06/12 in
