On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>> I committed the attached patch with most of your suggestions as r197968.
>
>
> Thanks! Although, I assume you meant "kind=8" in the last sentence:
>
>> +the underlying platform clock. @var{COUNT_MAX} usually equal
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
I committed the attached patch with most of your suggestions as r197968.
Thanks! Although, I assume you meant "kind=8" in the last sentence:
+the underlying platform clock. @var{COUNT_MAX} usually equals
+@code{HUGE(COUNT_MAX)}. Note that the millisecond resolution of t
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>> Attached is an updated patch which uses GetTickCount for system_clock_4;
>> this should be fine as system_clock_4 wraps around in ~25 days anyways. For
>> system_clock_8 it uses QueryPerformance{Counter,Frequency
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Attached is an updated patch which uses GetTickCount for
system_clock_4; this should be fine as system_clock_4 wraps around in
~25 days anyways. For system_clock_8 it uses
QueryPerformance{Counter,Frequency}.
The patch also adds an additional check for _POSIX_MONOTONI
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>> the attached patch implements the SYSTEM_CLOCK intrinsics on the MinGW
>> and Cygwin targets using the GetTickCount/GetTickCount64 functions.
>> These should be quite robust monotonic clocks and AFAICS are the bes
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 19:47, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
>> As I don't have a Windows system to test on, I would appreciate if somebody
>> more familiar with that platform could take a quick look. In particular, I
>> *think* it should be Ok to use win32 AP
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
the attached patch implements the SYSTEM_CLOCK intrinsics on the MinGW
and Cygwin targets using the GetTickCount/GetTickCount64 functions.
These should be quite robust monotonic clocks and AFAICS are the best
we can do on Windows.
I think using QueryPerformanceCounter is
On 12/04/2013 19:47, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> As I don't have a Windows system to test on, I would appreciate if somebody
> more familiar with that platform could take a quick look. In particular, I
> *think* it should be Ok to use win32 API functions on Cygwin (that is,
> cygwin-gcc ships the win
Hi,
the attached patch implements the SYSTEM_CLOCK intrinsics on the MinGW
and Cygwin targets using the GetTickCount/GetTickCount64 functions.
These should be quite robust monotonic clocks and AFAICS are the best
we can do on Windows. See e.g.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0418/ for details.
