On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>> I committed the attached patch with most of your suggestions as r197968.
>
>
> Thanks! Although, I assume you meant "kind=8" in the last sentence:
>
>> +the underlying platform clock. @var{COUNT_MAX} usually equals
>> +@code{HUGE(COUNT_MAX)}. Note that the millisecond resolution of the
>> +@var{kind=4} version implies that the @var{COUNT} will wrap around in
>> +roughly 25 days. In order to avoid issues with the wrap around and for
>> +more precise timing, please use the @var{kind=4} version.
>
>
> Hence, I committed the attached patch as obvious.Indeed, thanks for spotting it, and fixing it quickly! -- Janne Blomqvist
