>> If I saw it correctly, one still needs to fix the vendor-extension SIZEOF
>> for procedure pointers (it currently returns one byte!)
>
> Right. Actually I don't quite understand where that 1 byte comes from.
I have just committed the patch from comment #23 of the PR (which has
been approved by
>> here is another patch for PR47023, which takes care of comment #1,
>> i.e. rejecting polymorphic variables in a C-binding context.
>>
>> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
> OK. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks. Committed as r180130.
> If I saw it correctly, one still needs to
On 10/17/2011 11:37 PM, Janus Weil wrote:
here is another patch for PR47023, which takes care of comment #1,
i.e. rejecting polymorphic variables in a C-binding context.
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
OK. Thanks for the patch.
If I saw it correctly, one still needs to fi
Hi all,
here is another patch for PR47023, which takes care of comment #1,
i.e. rejecting polymorphic variables in a C-binding context. It also
adapts two functions (verify_c_interop,verify_c_interop_param) to the
gfortran naming convention of prefixing public routines with 'gfc_',
and fixes an er
