>> If I saw it correctly, one still needs to fix the vendor-extension SIZEOF >> for procedure pointers (it currently returns one byte!) > > Right. Actually I don't quite understand where that 1 byte comes from.
I have just committed the patch from comment #23 of the PR (which has been approved by Tobias privately), rejecting procedure pointers as actual arguments of SIZEOF: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180210 Patch includes documentation in intrinsic.texi (where I also fixed another minor nit). Cheers, Janus
