Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-05-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 4, 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > It looks like constfun's prototype had a typo with missing 2nd param for void > *. Ugh, the patch for https://gcc.gnu.org/PR90773 added the param the day after I retested the patch, and I did not give it yet another spin before checking it in :-( >

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-05-03 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 07:30, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On May 3, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> > On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-05-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 3, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> > On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >>> Here's an improved version of t

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-05-03 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >>> Here's an improved version of the patch. Regstrapped on > >>> x86_64-linux-gnu, wi

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-04-30 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: Here's an improved version of the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, with and without a patchlet that moved multi-pieces ahead of setmem, and al

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-04-28 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> Here's an improved version of the patch. Regstrapped on >> x86_64-linux-gnu, with and without a patchlet that moved multi-pieces >> ahead of setmem, and also tested with riscv32-elf. >> >> Is

Re: [PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-02-22 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > Here's an improved version of the patch. Regstrapped on > x86_64-linux-gnu, with and without a patchlet that moved multi-pieces > ahead of setmem, and also tested with riscv32-elf. > > Is it ok to install? Or should it wait for stage1?

[PR94092] Re: [RFC] test builtin ratio for loop distribution

2021-02-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Here's an improved version of the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, with and without a patchlet that moved multi-pieces ahead of setmem, and also tested with riscv32-elf. Is it ok to install? Or should it wait for stage1? [PR94092] introduce try store by multiple pieces From: Alexandre