On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:08 AM Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote:
> >>> Here's an improved version of the patch.  Regstrapped on
> >>> x86_64-linux-gnu, with and without a patchlet that moved multi-pieces
> >>> ahead of setmem, and also tested with riscv32-elf.
> >>>
> >>> Is it ok to install?  Or should it wait for stage1?
> >> It generally looks OK but I'd wait for stage1.
> > 'k, I've retested the patch now, and it's still working as expected.
>
> Then I'd go forward with it at this point.

Yes, it looks good to me as well.

Thanks,
Richard.

>
>
> >
> > I've dropped references to PR94092, since it's a different issue.
>
> ACK.  Note I just put a patch into pr94092 that may be of interest.  In
> simplest terms it tries to use REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN to increase the
> alignment of MEMs.  We'd been using it internally for a bit before we
> went a slightly different direction.  Feel free to use it if it's helpful.
>
>
> jeff
>

Reply via email to