RE: [PING] iwMMXt patches

2012-05-04 Thread Xinyu Qi
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts...@gmail.com] > To: Xinyu Qi > Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches > Subject: Re: [PING] iwMMXt patches > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Xinyu Qi wrote: > >> From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts..

Re: [PING] iwMMXt patches

2012-05-03 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Xinyu Qi wrote: >> From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts...@gmail.com] >> To: Xinyu Qi >> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches >> Subject: Re: [PING] iwMMXt patches >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >&

RE: [PING] iwMMXt patches

2012-05-02 Thread Xinyu Qi
> From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts...@gmail.com] > To: Xinyu Qi > Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches > Subject: Re: [PING] iwMMXt patches > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > Are these patches ready to go in? It looks like they were ack'd.

Re: [PING] iwMMXt patches

2012-05-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > Are these patches ready to go in? It looks like they were ack'd. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01815.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01817.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01816.html > h

[PING] iwMMXt patches

2012-04-17 Thread Matt Turner
Are these patches ready to go in? It looks like they were ack'd. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01815.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01817.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01816.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01818.html http://gc