> Paolo> The series is good!
>
> Thanks!
>
> I'm checking it in now. I'll be around to fix up any bugs I introduce.
> I'll send a note to the gcc list when I'm done, just to warn people.
Thank you for working on this!
Honza
>
> Tom
Paolo> The series is good!
Thanks!
I'm checking it in now. I'll be around to fix up any bugs I introduce.
I'll send a note to the gcc list when I'm done, just to warn people.
Tom
Il 25/09/2013 06:37, Alexandre Oliva ha scritto:
> On Sep 23, 2013, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>> First, I believe I've addressed all of the comments in Paolo's review.
>
> That's my feeling as well. Sorry that I didn't manage to go through
> earlier versions of the patch before; I've just reviewed v4
On Sep 23, 2013, Tom Tromey wrote:
> First, I believe I've addressed all of the comments in Paolo's review.
That's my feeling as well. Sorry that I didn't manage to go through
earlier versions of the patch before; I've just reviewed v4 plus the
discussions around v3.
Save for one detail, I'm e
Here is version 4 of my series to resurrect automatic dependencies for
GCC. Version 3 is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01106.html
This version has a few changes.
First, I believe I've addressed all of the comments in Paolo's review.
This added patch #5, to remove AM_PRO
