Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/08/2015 10:50 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > Note that however the dynamic linker does properly need to save and
> > restore call-clobbered registers used for argument passing (because of
> > IFUNCs, user-provided malloc, audit hooks etc. that might affect them
> > even i
On 05/08/2015 10:50 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Note that however the dynamic linker does properly need to save and
restore call-clobbered registers used for argument passing (because of
IFUNCs, user-provided malloc, audit hooks etc. that might affect them even
if the dynamic linker itself doesn't);
On 05/08/2015 08:25 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
an ABI variant agnostic dynamic linker at some point over the next
year by working towards a build that truly uses no float and is
hence compatible with all the ABI variants.
Having see
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:50:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > > I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
> > > > without further discussion.
> > > >
> > > > T
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
> > > without further discussion.
> > >
> > > There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
> > > an ABI
On 08/05/15 16:13, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 08/05/15 15:46, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Szabolcs Nagy writes:
if you think that's ok, i can now submit the patch with %{msoft-float:-
sf} added to all abi variants.
That's fine. Go ahead.
the patch for the record.
I've committed this on Szabolcs'
On 08/05/15 15:46, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Szabolcs Nagy writes:
>> if you think that's ok, i can now submit the patch with %{msoft-float:-
>> sf} added to all abi variants.
>
> That's fine. Go ahead.
>
the patch for the record.
Changelog:
2015-05-08 Gregor Richards
Szabolcs N
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
> > without further discussion.
> >
> > There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
> > an ABI variant agnostic dynamic linker at some point over t
Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> On 08/05/15 15:25, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > H.J. Lu writes:
> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Rich Felker writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Mat
On 08/05/15 15:25, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> H.J. Lu writes:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>> There does howeve
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:25:11PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> H.J. Lu writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > >> Rich Felker writes:
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortun
H.J. Lu writes:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> >> Rich Felker writes:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> There does however appear to be both soft and hard float variants
On 08/05/15 14:56, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>>> Rich Felker writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> There does however appear to be both soft and hard float varia
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>> Rich Felker writes:
>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There does however appear to be both soft and hard float variants
>
> Patch v2.
>
> Now all the AB
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Rich Felker writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>>> There does however appear to be both soft and hard float variants
Patch v2.
Now all the ABI variants musl plans to support are represented.
gcc/Changelog:
2
Rich Felker writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> > > Set up dynamic linker name for mips.
> > >
> > > gcc/Changelog:
> > >
> > > 2015-04-16 Gregor Richards
> > >
> > > * config/mips/linux.h (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Define.
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> > Set up dynamic linker name for mips.
> >
> > gcc/Changelog:
> >
> > 2015-04-16 Gregor Richards
> >
> > * config/mips/linux.h (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Define.
>
> I understand that mips musl is o32
Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> Set up dynamic linker name for mips.
>
> gcc/Changelog:
>
> 2015-04-16 Gregor Richards
>
> * config/mips/linux.h (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Define.
I understand that mips musl is o32 only currently is that correct?
There does however appear to be both soft and hard
Set up dynamic linker name for mips.
gcc/Changelog:
2015-04-16 Gregor Richards
* config/mips/linux.h (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Define.
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/linux.h b/gcc/config/mips/linux.h
index 91df261..5057bc5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/linux.h
+++ b/gcc/config/mips/linux.h
19 matches
Mail list logo
