On 08/05/15 14:56, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com> wrote: >> On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote: >>> Rich Felker <dal...@libc.org> writes: >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +0000, Matthew Fortune wrote: >>>>> There does however appear to be both soft and hard float variants >> >> Patch v2. >> >> Now all the ABI variants musl plans to support are represented. >> >> gcc/Changelog: >> >> 2015-04-27 Gregor Richards <gregor.richa...@uwaterloo.ca> >> Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com> >> >> * config/mips/linux.h (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER32): Define. >> (MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER64, MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKERN32): Define. >> (GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKERN32): Update. > > You checked in config/linux.h CHOOSE_DYNAMIC_LINKER change > without config/mips/linux.h change. Now linux-mips is broken. >
sorry, i cannot roll back the change right now or provide fix up patches. i thought i did the tests without the target patches.. but not mips (only mips is affected). while i'm waiting for the ppl with commit rights.. is it better to roll back the commit or do a single line fix to config/mips/linux.h? (the single line fix is to add a "/dev/null" fourth argument to CHOOSE_DYNAMIC_LINKER macro in the definition of GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKERN32 in config/mips/linux.h) i don't know why i got the mail with such a big delay :(
