Hi,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > which would be exactly the way no distribution would use it. So please
> > just don't bundle ISL with CLoog.
>
> Well, I would simply have linked the bundled ISL statically into
> libcloog.
Which would still require not exporting the (bundl
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers
>> wrote:
>>> I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
>>> making the bundled version the recommended version for GC
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers
>> wrote:
>>> I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
>>> making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC.
On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
>> I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
>> making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
>> many ways to configure things is bad.
>
> I
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:02:40AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
> > making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
> > many ways to configure
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
> making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
> many ways to configure things is bad.
I would prefer using the ISL bundled with CLooG and not ha
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > > Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:30:25PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Skimo,
>Currently we don't have any checks for the minimal isl version required.
I assume they will be added at some point.
AFAIU, Sebastian just started working on this.
It will take some time for him to finish the transition.
A
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
> > > there is a requirement to bui
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:22:04PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
> > there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
> > libisl.a
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
> > there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
> > libisl.a overwrites CLooG's
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:50, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> > > +@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
>> > > +
>>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
> there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
> libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather than the other way round (supposing
> that the
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
> > If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
> > libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
> If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
> libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4 thinks it does at present), why should
> someone ne
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > > +@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
> > > +
> > > +Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
> > > +It ca
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > > +@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
> > > +
> > > +Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimiz
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > +@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
> > +
> > +Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
> > +It can be downloaded from @uref{http://www.kotnet.org/~skimo/is
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> ---
> gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> @@ -
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:16:05AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> ---
> gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ It can be downloaded from
@uref{http://www.
21 matches
Mail list logo
