On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements. > If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as > libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4 thinks it does at present), why should > someone need to download and install a separate ISL package rather than > getting libisl.a from CLooG-ISL?
The one that comes with CLooG may not be recent enough. skimo
