On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 12:19 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 20:40 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> > Here is the final patch after fixing all the nits mentioned.
> >
> > Successfully bootstrapped and completed regress tests on x86_64-
> > linux-
> > gnu.
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> A
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 20:40 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> Here is the final patch after fixing all the nits mentioned.
>
> Successfully bootstrapped and completed regress tests on x86_64-linux-
> gnu.
Great, thanks!
A very minor nit re ChangeLog entries: when referencing a PR in a
patch, typicall
Here is the final patch after fixing all the nits mentioned.
Successfully bootstrapped and completed regress tests on x86_64-linux-gnu.
- - -
vfunc.patch
Description: Binary data
Thanks
- Ankur
On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 22:27 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review
>
> > On 16-Aug-2021, at 4:48 AM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, this is looking promising. Has this been rebased recently
> > (e.g. since I merged
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-Augu
Thanks for the review
> On 16-Aug-2021, at 4:48 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Thanks, this is looking promising. Has this been rebased recently
> (e.g. since I merged
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/576737.html )
Yes, The branch is totally up to date with master at the
On Sun, 2021-08-15 at 20:28 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> The patch extends the analyser’s functionality to understand and
> analyze indirect calls (calls via a function pointer or calls to
> virtual functions )
>
> On successful merging, the patch should also fix the following bugs :-
>
> 1. htt
The patch extends the analyser’s functionality to understand and analyze
indirect calls (calls via a function pointer or calls to virtual functions )
On successful merging, the patch should also fix the following bugs :-
1. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100546
2. https://gcc.gnu
