On 05/09/17 18:40, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 09/05/2017 05:52 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Yeah, ISTR it was close, though there were a couple things
that needed addressing still.
The wiki seems to miss a pointer to following iterations/review
of that patch (mailing list archives don't cross month
On 09/05/2017 05:52 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 05/08/17 20:05, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> That'd be an "obvious" choice, and I'm not terribly against it,
>> though I wonder whether it'd be taking over a name that has a wider
>> scope than intended? I.e., GNU is a larger set of projects than th
On 05/08/17 20:05, Pedro Alves wrote:
That'd be an "obvious" choice, and I'm not terribly against it,
though I wonder whether it'd be taking over a name that has a wider
scope than intended? I.e., GNU is a larger set of projects than the
GNU toolchain. For example, there's Gnulib, which already
On 09/04/2017 11:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 05/08/17 20:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2017 07:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
>
> I've been s
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 05/08/17 20:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>> On 08/04/2017 07:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally gett
HI,
figured I'd ping this to see if we can come to some concensus, I don't
care much what we choose as a namespace, I just want to get this in so
we can use it more.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:43:21PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 05/08/17 20:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On 08/04/2017 07
>Good point. "gnutools" might be more accurate, but people might object
>to adding 10 extra characters for "gnutools::".
>Naming is important, especially for a whole namespace (not just a
>single type) so I do think it's worth spending time getting it right.
>But I could live with gtl as long as
On 05/08/17 20:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 08/04/2017 07:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a
whi
On 05/08/17 01:36 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:52:18PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
> importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class
On 08/04/2017 07:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
>> I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
>> importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a
>> while
>> back.
Thanks a lot for doing
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:52:18PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
> > importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a while
> > back. I beli
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:43:32PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 05:46 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
> > importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedr
On 07/31/2017 05:46 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a while
back. I believe the gtl namespace also comes from Pedro, but
On 31/07/17 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a while
back. I believe the gtl namespace also comes from Pedro, but GNU template
library seems a
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 19:46 -0400, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting
> to
> importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a
> while
> back. I believe the gtl namespace
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
I've been saying I'd do this for a long time, but I'm finally getting to
importing the C++98 compatable unique_ptr class Pedro wrote for gdb a while
back. I believe the gtl namespace also comes from Pedro, but GNU template
library seems as reasonable as any other name
16 matches
Mail list logo
