On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> If it is an initializer from constants we gimplify to a series of
> assigns it might be still useful. OTOH, I'm not sure whether
> a const auto is really readonly in C or if it is safe to assume
> the stack part is writable and thus casting away the co
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:16PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > + /* Unless this is called during FE folding. */
> >
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:16PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > + /* Unless this is called during FE folding. */
> > > > + if (cfun
> > > > + && (cfun->curr_
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > + /* Unless this is called during FE folding. */
> > > + if (cfun
> > > + && (cfun->curr_properties & (PROP_trees | PROP_rtl)) == 0
> >
> > don't you want && (cfun->curr_
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > + /* Unless this is called during FE folding. */
> > + if (cfun
> > + && (cfun->curr_properties & (PROP_trees | PROP_rtl)) == 0
>
> don't you want && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_trees) != 0?
No, PROP_trees is mis
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > I think it would make more sense.
> > We could also simply clean it up next stage1.
>
> I'll rebootstrap/retest the following version then (adding PROP_rtl
> just in case it would be calle
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I think it would make more sense.
> We could also simply clean it up next stage1.
I'll rebootstrap/retest the following version then (adding PROP_rtl
just in case it would be called during expand or later).
2021-01-26 Jakub Jelinek
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > > > > folding,
> > > > > but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > > > > folding,
> > > > > but we don't d
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > > > folding,
> > > > but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > > folding,
> > > but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been
> > > turned into a
> > > GIMPLE centric API, but as the testcase s
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > > folding,
> > > but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been
> > > turned into a
> >
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC
> > folding,
> > but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been turned
> > into a
> > GIMPLE centric API, but as the testcase shows, it is
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC folding,
> but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been turned
> into a
> GIMPLE centric API, but as the testcase shows, it is invoked even during
> GEN
Hi!
In 4.8 and earlier we used to fold the following to 0 during GENERIC folding,
but we don't do that anymore because ctor_for_folding etc. has been turned into
a
GIMPLE centric API, but as the testcase shows, it is invoked even during
GENERIC folding and there the automatic vars still should ha
15 matches
Mail list logo
