On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > + /* Unless this is called during FE folding. */
> > + if (cfun
> > + && (cfun->curr_properties & (PROP_trees | PROP_rtl)) == 0
>
> don't you want && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_trees) != 0?
No, PROP_trees is misnamed and it actually means GIMPLE.
I could use (PROP_gimple_any | PROP_rtl) if that is more readable,
PROP_trees stands for:
(PROP_gimple_any | PROP_gimple_lcf | PROP_gimple_leh | PROP_gimple_lomp)
but I don't think we ever have any of the latter 3 set when PROP_gimple_any
is not set.
Jakub
