On 1/10/25 11:18 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> The loop checking for built-in constant operand restrictions was missing
> some operands due to the loop limit being too small. Fixing that exposed
> a testsuite failure which is caused by a typo in the pmxvi4ger8pp definition
> where we had made the PMA
FYI, I discovered this latent bug while testing a patch I'm working on.
The loop checking for built-in constant operand restrictions was missing
some operands due to the loop limit being too small. Fixing that exposed
a testsuite failure which is caused by a typo in the pmxvi4ger8pp definition
wh
