On 1/10/25 11:18 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: > The loop checking for built-in constant operand restrictions was missing > some operands due to the loop limit being too small. Fixing that exposed > a testsuite failure which is caused by a typo in the pmxvi4ger8pp definition > where we had made the PMASK field too small. > > Bootstrapped and retested on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions. > Ok for trunk and backports after some trunk burn-in time?
Approved offline by Segher, so I pushed the commit. I'll let it bake on trunk for a bit before backporting. Peter