On 1/10/25 11:18 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> The loop checking for built-in constant operand restrictions was missing
> some operands due to the loop limit being too small.  Fixing that exposed
> a testsuite failure which is caused by a typo in the pmxvi4ger8pp definition
> where we had made the PMASK field too small.
> 
> Bootstrapped and retested on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions.
> Ok for trunk and backports after some trunk burn-in time?

Approved offline by Segher, so I pushed the commit.
I'll let it bake on trunk for a bit before backporting.

Peter


Reply via email to