On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 5:45 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:07 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/1/24 4:12 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> > > > lra: emit caller-save register spills before call ins
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:07 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/1/24 4:12 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> > > lra: emit caller-save register spills before call insn [PR116028]
> > >
> > > LRA emits insns to save caller-save registers i
Hi!
Sorry for replying late...
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 05:15, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:11 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 17:55 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >
> > > Still, for GCC developer novice, I think it is important to test all
> > > major ta
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:15:31PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I had been wondering the same until I looked into it earlier today.
> Linaro CI's does `--disable-bootstrap` and there was no extra
> testsuite failures with the patch.
> So Linaro CI's is not catching all the bugs that a develop
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:11 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 17:55 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> > Still, for GCC developer novice, I think it is important to test all
> > major targets and aarch64 (one target on which bootstrap was broken) is
> > the 2nd most important target.
>
On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 17:55 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> Still, for GCC developer novice, I think it is important to test all
> major targets and aarch64 (one target on which bootstrap was broken) is
> the 2nd most important target.
Linaro CI will complain (via off-list email) if a patch po
On 8/9/24 17:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 8/9/24 12:02 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I believe your should reverse the original patch and all the patches you
submitted to fix the issues with the original patch.
I agree this commit should be reverted and Kyrill has pushed that already,
so bootstr
On 8/9/24 12:02 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> I believe your should reverse the original patch and all the patches you
> submitted to fix the issues with the original patch.
I agree this commit should be reverted and Kyrill has pushed that already,
so bootstrap should be restored now. Thank you K
> On 9 Aug 2024, at 19:02, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 8/9/24 08:58, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
>> I am looking into this failure.
>>
> Sorry for delay with this email. I was on vacation.
>
> I believe your should reverse t
On 8/9/24 08:58, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
I am looking into this failure.
Sorry for delay with this email. I was on vacation.
I believe your should reverse the original patch and all the patches you
submitted to fix the issues with the original patch.
This is a standard procedure in s
On 8/9/24 6:58 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
I am looking into this failure.
Also note that it appears that this change is causing either an infinite
loop or severe compile-time regression for Wrestrict.
Build a cross for xstormy16-elf. You don't need a full toolchain, just
compiler shou
I am looking into this failure.
Thanks,
Surya
On 09/08/24 2:37 am, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/24 4:12 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
>>> lra: emit caller-save register spills before call insn [PR116028]
>>>
>>> LRA emits insns to sav
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 02:07:50PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > > 2024-08-01 Surya Kumari Jangala
> > >
> > > gcc/
> > > PR rtl-optimization/PR116028
> > > * lra-constraints.cc (split_reg): Spill register before call
> > >
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:30 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/1/24 4:12 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> > lra: emit caller-save register spills before call insn [PR116028]
> >
> > LRA emits insns to save caller-save registers in the
> > inheritance/splitting pass. In this pass, LRA builds EBBs (Ex
On 8/1/24 4:12 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
lra: emit caller-save register spills before call insn [PR116028]
LRA emits insns to save caller-save registers in the
inheritance/splitting pass. In this pass, LRA builds EBBs (Extended
Basic Block) and traverses the insns in the EBBs in reverse
lra: emit caller-save register spills before call insn [PR116028]
LRA emits insns to save caller-save registers in the
inheritance/splitting pass. In this pass, LRA builds EBBs (Extended
Basic Block) and traverses the insns in the EBBs in reverse order from
the last insn to the first insn. When LR
16 matches
Mail list logo
