On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:41 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 30 Jan 2023, at 07:48, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:35 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
> >> 4.6 but, it seems, n
> On 30 Jan 2023, at 07:48, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:35 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
>> 4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
>> various Darwin
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:35 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
> 4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
> various Darwin versions and x86_64, powerpc64 linux,
> OK for trunk {now,stage1}
Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
various Darwin versions and x86_64, powerpc64 linux,
OK for trunk {now,stage1}?
thanks, Iain
--- 8< ---
For a regular compile job, with -v we emit the GCC
