> On 30 Jan 2023, at 07:48, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:35 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> Technically, this is seems to be a regression somewhere between 4.2 and
>> 4.6 but, it seems, not enough for anyone to care too much. Tested on
>> various Darwin versions and x86_64, powerpc64 linux,
>> OK for trunk {now,stage1}?
>
> This will elide the earlier printing, right?
Yes.
> eliding the 2nd would be prefered so the info comes first?
Indeed; that is better ..
how about this update then?
OK for trunk now/stage1?
— 8< ---
For a regular compile job, with -v we emit the GCC version information
twice - once from main() and once from process_options().
We do not need to output the second header.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk>
gcc/ChangeLog:
* toplev.cc (toplev::main): Only print the version information header
from toplevel main().
---
gcc/toplev.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/toplev.cc b/gcc/toplev.cc
index 42937f0ba00..4c15d4f542e 100644
--- a/gcc/toplev.cc
+++ b/gcc/toplev.cc
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ process_options (bool no_backend)
option flags in use. */
if (version_flag)
{
- print_version (stderr, "", true);
+ /* We already printed the version header in main (). */
if (!quiet_flag)
{
fputs ("options passed: ", stderr);
--
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
