On 2/22/19 4:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 04:17:14PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 2/22/19 3:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR tree-optimization/88993
PR tree-optimization/88835
* gcc.dg/t
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 04:17:14PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 2/22/19 3:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > PR tree-optimization/88993
> > > PR tree-optimization/88835
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c: New te
On 2/22/19 3:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR tree-optimization/88993
PR tree-optimization/88835
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c: New test.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> PR tree-optimization/88993
> PR tree-optimization/88835
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-snprintf-w
On 2/19/19 5:43 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I received feedback on the first patch that it doesn't suppress all
> the instances of the warning so I've relaxed the checker even more
> to avoid the excess instances seen in Elfutils and beefed up
> the tests. The top of trunk compiles cleanly now with
I received feedback on the first patch that it doesn't suppress all
the instances of the warning so I've relaxed the checker even more
to avoid the excess instances seen in Elfutils and beefed up
the tests. The top of trunk compiles cleanly now with just
the three instances of -Wformat-truncation
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00224.html
(This patch also handles bug 88835.)
On 2/4/19 8:58 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch relaxes -Wformat-overflow=2 to avoid warning about
individual directives that might (but need not) exceed the 4095 byte
limit, and about
On 2/4/19, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The attached patch relaxes -Wformat-overflow=2 to avoid warning about
> individual directives that might (but need not) exceed the 4095 byte
> limit, and about the total function output that likewise might (but
> need not) exceed the INT_MAX limit.
>
> The bug repo
The attached patch relaxes -Wformat-overflow=2 to avoid warning about
individual directives that might (but need not) exceed the 4095 byte
limit, and about the total function output that likewise might (but
need not) exceed the INT_MAX limit.
The bug report actually requests that instead of the s
