On 2/22/19 3:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR tree-optimization/88993
PR tree-optimization/88835
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-snprintf-warn-3.c: Adjust.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c: Same.
Can you please, when testing a patch like this where you should expect
tbe wordsize will play an important role to test it with
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\}
tree-ssa.exp=builtin-*printf-warn*'
?
There are many failures on ilp32 targets.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 114)
I don't see these failures with -m32. They must be specific to 32-bit
GCC itself.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/l (test for warnings, line 115)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 116)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 166)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 167)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 168)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 224)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 225)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 226)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 282)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 283)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 284)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 36)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 37)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 38)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-2.c (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 135)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 136)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 137)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 193)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 194)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 195)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 251)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 252)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 253)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 30)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 31)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 32)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 83)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 84)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for warnings, line 85)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-2.c (test for excess errors)
and
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-10.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c second (test for warnings, line
120)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c second (test for warnings, line
122)
are not new today.
I silenced these warnings: they were due to bug 77970 where -Wformat
complains for
printf ("%lc", L'x');
with -m32 but not with -m64.
Martin
