On 06/03/2024 20:28, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> Thanks for the review.
>
>> For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I
>> don't think we need this now.
>
> ACK. I see
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:28:21PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" wrote:
>
> > On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Thanks for the review.
>
> > For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I
> > don't think we need t
On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" wrote:
> On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.
> For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I
> don't think we need this now.
ACK. I see the c2x-stdarg-4.c test is now passing in our arm-eabi
gc
On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Hello, Matthew,
>
> Thanks for the review.
For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I don't
think we need this now.
R.
>
> On Feb 26, 2024, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
>
>> I think you're right that the AAPCS32 requires al
Hello, Matthew,
Thanks for the review.
On Feb 26, 2024, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> I think you're right that the AAPCS32 requires all arguments to be passed in
> registers for this testcase.
> (Nit on the commit-message: It says that your reading of the AAPCS32
> suggests
> that the *caller* is
Hi Alexandre,
I don't have the ability to OK the patch, but I'm attempting to do a
review in
order to reduce the workload for any maintainer. (Apologies for the slow
response).
I think you're right that the AAPCS32 requires all arguments to be passed in
registers for this testcase.
(Nit on th
On Dec 5, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> arm: fix c23 0-named-args caller-side stdarg
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639472.html
> The commit message doesn't name explicitly the fixed testsuite
> failures. Here they are:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-4.c execution
On Nov 19, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On arm-eabi targets, c23 stdarg execution tests that pass arguments to
> (...) functions (without any named argument), the caller passes
> everything on the stack, but the callee expects arguments in
> registers.
Ping? This slightly modified patch only
On arm-eabi targets, c23 stdarg execution tests that pass arguments to
(...) functions (without any named argument), the caller passes
everything on the stack, but the callee expects arguments in
registers. My reading of the AAPCS32 suggests that the caller is
correct, so I've arranged for the c
