On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Jeff Law wrote:
> I think most are posting the stdout from the check run. So we don't
> generally get all the pass/xfail messages, but we do get fail/xpass
> messages. They don't need to be triaged or anything.
I now have the results, though I had to trim them by hand fro
On 1/10/21 7:45 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-eq-notsi.c: Use subtraction from a
>>> constant then rather than addition.
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-le-notsi.c: Likewise.
>>> * gcc.target
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Jeff Law wrote:
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-eq-notsi.c: Use subtraction from a
> > constant then rather than addition.
> > * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-le-notsi.c: Likewise.
> > * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-lt-notsi.c: Likewise.
> OK
Thank you
On 1/8/21 5:49 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Remove fallout from commit 0bd675183d94 ("match.pd: Add ~(X - Y) -> ~X
> + Y simplification [PR96685]") and paper over the regression caused as
> it is not the matter of the test cases affected.
>
> Previously assembly like this:
>
> .text
>
Remove fallout from commit 0bd675183d94 ("match.pd: Add ~(X - Y) -> ~X
+ Y simplification [PR96685]") and paper over the regression caused as
it is not the matter of the test cases affected.
Previously assembly like this:
.text
.align 1
.globl eq_notsi
.type eq_notsi,
