On 1/10/21 7:45 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-eq-notsi.c: Use subtraction from a
>>> constant then rather than addition.
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-le-notsi.c: Likewise.
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-lt-notsi.c: Likewise.
>> OK
> Thank you for your review. I have applied this change now and the
> remaining ones you have approved. I'll be watching out for any further
> concerns, but otherwise I consider VAX backend development complete for
> this release cycle.
Sounds good.
>
> Also I have now scheduled full regression testing of the `vax-netbsdelf'
> target with the timeout extended to 7200 seconds. Hopefully this will let
> all cases complete that do not infinitely loop. I can post results to
> gcc-testresults if that would be desired (is there a dedicated format for
> that mailing list?), and overall they need to be triaged before anything
> can be decided about what to do next.
>
> I have seen some failures coming from individual test cases' assumption
> of the floating-point format being IEEE 754, so at least these can be
> easily excluded, or variants for the alternative format provided, as
> applicable.
I think most are posting the stdout from the check run. So we don't
generally get all the pass/xfail messages, but we do get fail/xpass
messages. They don't need to be triaged or anything.
jeff
