On 11/12/2014 06:53 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
Anyway, I will defer working on this until next stage1, because I don't
have time to implement this before stage1 closes on Saturday.
I think this should be OK for stage 3, especially given that you first
sent the patch before the end of stage
On 11/11/2014 03:06 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.11 at 13:39 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:37 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.11 at 10:11 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.p
On 2014.11.11 at 13:39 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 10:37 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2014.11.11 at 10:11 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
> >>> @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
> >
On 11/11/2014 10:37 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.11 at 10:11 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
// the template
namespace N {
- template class foo; // { dg-error
On Nov 11, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> Both EGG and clang currently accept it.
EDG… I think you mean.
On 2014.11.11 at 10:11 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
> > @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
> > // the template
> >
> > namespace N {
> > - template class foo;// { dg-error "" } referenced below
> > +
On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
// the template
namespace N {
- template class foo; // { dg-error "" } referenced below
+ template class foo; // { dg-error "" "" { target { ! c++11 } } }
referenced b
DR374: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#374
allows explicit specialization of templates in the enclosing namespace.
This is implemented by consolidating check_specialization_namespace and
check_explicit_instantiation_namespace into a new function and
pedwarning only for
On 2014.11.02 at 13:58 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec25.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec25.C
> index 385d19ada0c4..d41c5fce1297 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec25.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec25.C
> @@ -1,
DR374: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#374
allows explicit specialization of templates in the enclosing namespace.
Because this idiom is currently already accepted with -fpermissive, the
fix is easy: Just skip the calls to permerror() for C++11 and up.
Tested on powerp
10 matches
Mail list logo
