On 11/11/2014 03:06 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.11 at 13:39 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:37 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.11 at 10:11 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
// the template
namespace N {
- template <class T> class foo; // { dg-error "" } referenced below
+ template <class T> class foo; // { dg-error "" "" { target { ! c++11 } } }
referenced below
}
using namespace N;
-template <> class foo<void>; // { dg-error "" } invalid specialization
+template <> class foo<void>; // { dg-error "" "" { target { ! c++11 } } }
invalid specialization
This should still get an error in C++11 mode.
Both EGG and clang currently accept it.
EDG rejects it in strict mode.
They also reject g++.dg/template/spec36.C and
g++.old-deja/g++.pt/lookup10.C with "-strict-ansi -std=c++11".
Which is kind of ironical given that two of their employees worked on
the issue:
Yeah, sometimes implementation lags behind drafting... :)
In any case, I think the standard is clear that this should get an
error, and the EDG and Clang implementers agree with me.
Jason
